The Evidence Hub: Harnessing the Collective Intelligence of Communities to Build Evidence-Based Knowledge

Conventional document and discussion websites provide users with no help in assessing the quality or quantity of evidence behind any given idea. Besides, the very meaning of what evidence is may not be unequivocally defined within a community, and may require deep understanding, common ground and debate. An Evidence Hub is a tool to pool the community collective intelligence on what is evidence for an idea. It provides an infrastructure for debating and building evidence-based knowledge and practice. An Evidence Hub is best thought of as a filter onto other websites — a map that distills the most important issues, ideas and evidence from the noise by making clear why ideas and web resources may be worth further investigation. This paper describes the Evidence Hub concept and rationale, the breath of user engagement and the evolution of specific features, derived from our work with different community groups in the healthcare and educational sector.

The Evidence Hub is a contested collective intelligence tool for communities to gather and debate evidence for ideas and solutions to specific community issues. By aggregating and connecting single contributions theEvidence Hub provides a collective picture of what is the evidence for different ideas, which have been shared by an online community.”

Read the full paper here.

Posted in Academic Research in CI, Technologies That Support CI | 1 Comment

Mindful Together: shared mindfulness amplifies

Good night, good morning

Instead of talking about, can we try talking from and to mindfulness? From mine to yours, from yours to mine. Embodying it right here and now, as I’m writing these words, and you embodying it wherever you are, as you’re reading them. Even separated by time and space, and connected by a shared curiosity, we can be mindful together. But mindful of what?

I’m at the end of a long day and mindful of its wear on my body, the pull of the dreamworld. I am also mindful of your presence, without which I would not have a reason to write. I’m also aware of the social space that connects us, including HuffPost, and the broader field of mindfulness bourgeoning in the UK. How about you? What are you mindful of, right now?

I pause here… and before I welcome the blessed night, I enter one of my favourite meditation spaces, inspired by Thomas Hübl. It consists of focusing my attention on the exploration of the inner world of my body, my emotions, my thought, my consciousness, and the web of my beloved relations, in short sequences, staying on each stage long enough just to feel an authentic connection with it.

Whilst I’ll be in my sleeping break, why don’t you pause reading this blog and turn your attention inward, onto a similar journey, just for the fun of it…

Now, it’s morning, and the first thought of the day goes to you. Where did we leave it off, what would be good to share next?

 

Matryoshka mindfulness

1200px-Russian-Matryoshka2Imagine being inside a set of Russian dolls of decreasing size. Inside the innermost, smallest one of the nested, hollow matryoshkas there’s a baby that is you. These dolls are not the usual wooden ones; they are made of some kind of semi-translucent bubble material. The baby is sensing the presence of layers upon layers outside its immediate bubble, but can’t see clearly the patterns painted on them until it knocks on the dome above its head. It is that semi-translucent bubble we call “reality” is where we live, most of the time.

With proper training in the arts and sciences of mind-fitness, we can become aware of several layers of our reality, concurrently. For example, we will be able to hold in our awareness some of our body sensations, our emotions, our thoughts, all at once. With trained attention, we can add to the mix the broad segments of the geographic and social worlds that we’re embedded in. Why would we want to do that? The more we can listen, the more we can hear. The more we can hear, the wiser and more adequate our response will be to the challenges and opportunities that life presents to us, individually and collectively.

 

From me to we to all of us: growing the fruits of shared mindfulness

To meet critical challenges, as groups, communities and organisations in our VUCA times of increasing Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity and Ambiguity, we must act from a higher level of individual and collective consciousness. Becoming more mindful as a person is an important first step but it is insufficient if not extended to cultivating shared mindfulness if we are to make a larger, positive impact in the world.

In my experience, when all of us in a conversation or collaborative action are practicing expanded attention or other mind-fitness disciplines, then a potent inter-subjective field comes into being that is much more than the sum of the individual mind states. The resulting “shared mindfulness” allows us to sense what is happening more accurately, think more clearly, act more coherently, and achieve greater results.

How are we going to scale the achievable, shared mindfulness of small groups to organisations, co-intelligent local and regional communities, and wiser social institutions that truly care for the whole and all parts of it? The first thing is to notice what is already moving in that direction, even if it is only a relatively small step. For example, did you know that a recent session of the UK All-Party Parliamentary Group on Wellbeing Economics meeting was focused on How Government Policy Can Improve Wellbeing: Mindfulness in Health and Education? Or, have you heard of the fledgling Mindful Together community on Facebook?

Another sign is a series of “wisdom at work” workshops coming to London in June, where mind-fitness, shared mindfulness, and their fertile relationship will be addressed.

How can we co-evolve practices for growing greater mindfulness at increasing scale? We can do that through such innovation mechanisms as cultivating mindfulness as a community art, and having a differentiated approach to develop various mind-fitness disciplines, then cross-train ourselves in them. The “how” is the subject of future blogs.

Meanwhile, those of us inspired by the possibility to realize a wider range of benefits from mindfulness beyond the individual, let’s connect with each other and learn from our experiences. If that appeals to you, come over and join us in the fledgling Mindful Together community on Facebook.

George Pór is an integral mindfulness mentor and learning partner to change makers in business and society.

 

Posted in CI Within, Shared Mindfulness, Thomas Hübl | Tagged | 2 Comments

An experiment to combine electronic and mindfulness amplification processes

To follow on what I started exploring in my note about the personal and transpersonal meaning of increased technical connectivity, I want to put some seeds in the ground about the possibility combine electronic and mindfulness processes that amplify  the connectivity in the emerging global brain and heart.

Couldn’t it be an interesting experiment to explore the difference between “natural” amplification using our the built-in social tools of our various electronic campfires, and conscious amplification adding intentionally enhanced discoverability.

Here’s what I mean by the latter. If the YouTube recommendation wouldn’t have gifted me with this video, I may have never learned about it. If it was tagged, indexed and made part of an evolving outline structure that attend, my chance to discover it could be much higher. Same is true if it its was captured by any of the video to text tools, and made searchable.

Another experiment that I’m even more interested in is the combination of electronic and mindfulness amplifications. Its purpose will be maximizing the electronic connectivity of this blog and meshing it with such tools and processes as Chaordic Chat and ContemplaTweet. Who else is interested?

Posted in Shared Mindfulness, Technologies That Support CI | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

A note about the personal and transpersonal meaning of increased technical connectivity

I like to watch YouTube vids while working out on my exercise bike. Since YouTube’s algorithms are getting as good at suggesting vids for me as Amazon does with books, usually I graze its recommendations page before jumping on my bike. That’s how I discovered the “Data, Storytelling and Narratives” conversation between John Kellden and David Amerland.

At 5:43, David is talking about the connectivity factor as amplification factor. Doing so, he is brilliantly describing also one of the key insights that happens to drive my research on shared mindfulness. What is obvious is that the more connected a person, a thought, a video is, the broader its reach. What is less obvious is the transpersonal dimension of the  amplification factor.

In the very same act of one’s ideas reaching a wider audience, something else is happening, too, at the same time.Through the billions blogs, vids, tweets, likes, and comments that we post every minute, the neurons are forming in the nervous system of our global meta-being. These early-stage neurons are very crude and they will probably not get much smarter before the generalizations of semantic video, semantic search, and the radically disruptive social practices that will be associated with them.

What does all that have to do with shared mindfulness? A lot. First, it provides an analogy and a narrative to talk about the transpersonal dimension of transcending solo  mindfulness, as a need grounded in our tech-enabled, emerging planetary reality. A key feature of that reality is the “innervation” of the social hypercortex, which Teilhard de Chardin talked about half a century ago. More about that, another time, once I finished a new blog about the subject.

The  other way, in which shared mindfulness and increased connectivity relate to each other is this: The first can turn the second into a compelling opportunity to wise up our communities, organizations, and social institutions. That takes us closer to the Holy Grail of CI research: how to boost of collective wisdom at increasing scale? When we’ll have figured that out, then the “radically disruptive social practices” will kick in.

Thank you John and David for triggering this note.

p.s. A sequel to this note is here: An experiment to combine electronic and mindfulness amplification processes

Posted in Shared Attention, Shared Mindfulness, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Somewhere, on our way to humankind’s awakening…

Somewhere, on our way to humankind’s awakening to its collective wisdom, global heart, and sentience… self-organizing communities of co-creation and practice will master the combination of swarm intelligence ( see also starlings as teachers ) with wildfire learning (see chapter 7 in my Federated Framework for Self-evolving Educational Experience Design on Massive Scale).

Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments

CI as collective consciousness in action (both being and doing)

Yet another definition:

“Mastering collective intelligence is the deliberate exercising of collective consciousness in action (both being & doing) where we can see and recognise the steps, relationships and rational process that is contributing to the power and potential of any group. Collective intelligence is energy and information working together to imagine a future, explore new possibilities, address an issue or solve a problem.” (Zenergy)

Posted in Definitions | 3 Comments

Dysfunctional Collective Intelligence

Below is an excerpt from How to Create a Group Mind | 100 Trillion Connections, by Duncan Work.

“A dysfunctional society, or group mind, is full of emotion-laden biases, fears, animosity, internal hostilities, greed, bitter or violent competitions (winner-take-all), or is simply deeply fragmented and incapable of making good decisions. All of these traits are indicators of very unhealthy group minds – so unhealthy as to be called insane, broken. So broken it doesn’t feel right to call them minds at all.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

Letting collective intelligence use me for organizing itself

I emailed a tweet I’ve just stumbled upon in my tweetstream to a colleague because I knew it had to do with one of her interests.

We cannot spend all our time on hanging out in the stream but the larger is the circle of friends who care for us, the better are the chances that we can stay informed not only 0.5% but maybe 1% of what we need to know about what is happening in the noosphere.

She responded, “You’re a good sensor, you ….”

That inspired the following message from me, which I decided to share here because I’m curious of what y’all think of it.

light sensor It’s a kind of “organic” sensor that feeds on feedback that moves action…  In other words, I let collective intelligence use me for organizing itself in the following way:

I send the gems I pick up on my surfpath to friends all over the world, to whom one or the other piece I think can be relevant. Then, I use the quality of feedback, the excitement it generates (or not) to refine my filtering-and-forwarding strategy.

I guess it takes a great deal of imagination to make sense out of what I try to express here. I could use if in the comments to this post, you would share whatever it triggers in you.

Posted in Collaborative Sense-Making, Collective Intellect Augments Individual, Shared Attention | Tagged | 26 Comments

The Emergence of Higher We-Spaces

Lánc híd, BudapestThe Emergence of Higher We-Spaces:  steps towards humankind awakening to its collective sentience  |  Lessons from trailblazing practice communities

Introductory section of my presentation invited to the Integral European Conference, Budapest, Hungary, May 8-11, 2014

Introduction: personal and planetary contexts

(draft)

I am irresistibly drawn to observe and participate in the emergence of situations and communities, where people are capable to sense, think, relate, and act, momentarily or in a sustained way, from a beyond-ego state or stage of consciousness. They exist in a domain that I call “higher We-spaces.” My passion to experience and explore that emergence, from as close as I can, comes from both personal and planetary drivers.

Here is my personal motivation: In the most thrilling moments of my participation in the energy field of a retreat with Thomas Hübl, or the sangha around Diane Musho Hamilton’s work, or an Enlightened Communication circle, I felt a tidal wave of consciousness hitting the room, and the tide was lifting all boats of our individual states of consciousness.

There’s a growing literature of articles, conference presentations, blogposts, and lists of We-space-inducing injunctions and practices, etc., and reading them can help us understand the what, why, and how of what is emerging. The most rewarding direct knowledge comes from the first-person immersion in the experience of its underlying mystical principles that Thomas Hübl wrote in the The Coming Waves[1]. That’s why I feel the call to study, write about, and immerse myself in this subject.

There’s also a planetary context of my fascination with higher We-spaces. Humanity is on a learning expedition, the next leg of which seems to be a sort of global “flow state,” where unprecedented challenges and unprecedented capabilities are facing off. That state is typically described in the psychological terms of motivation and full immersion in experience, which harness one’s emotional energies in the service of learning or performing an act. To overcome our global crises will require all that from the collective psyche, and more.

As a sign of our times, there are numerous variations of the following saying attributed to Einstein, which are spreading over the Net: “No problem can be solved at the same level of consciousness that created it.” So, where are we going to get the higher level collective consciousness required to meet the challenges of our times? A good place to start exploring the paths to the answer to that question, I believe, is the higher We-space experiments currently pursued by various pioneering communities in the integral, evolutionary ecosystem. “For the level of complexity of the organizational and cultural difficulties now facing the human species, nothing short of an awakened We Space will do.”[2]

The human race is just starting to take some baby steps to reach planetary consciousness and collective sentience. We lived the first few 100,000s years crawling, and we are starting to learn standing up and walking. Looked at from that context, the communities, where higher We-spaces manifest, are in the tip of the wave of the shift in consciousness that is sweeping the planet. Can it be that the inter-subjective practices in their groups and events pre-figure an emergent planetary culture?

That’s an epic narrative unfolding in front of our eyes. To enjoy it more, one has to be part of it. Writing and playing out that drama together, we can also influence the pace of the much-needed (and happening) global mind shift. This paper is an invitation to it. Read on, tune in, and sense into what has the most heart and meaning for you…

[to be continued]


[1] The Gateway into the Future: Mysticism for Our Times, by Thomas Hübl, in The Coming Waves: Evolution, Transformation, and Action in an Integral Way, (edited by Dustin DiPerna and H.B. Augustine) http://www.thecomingwaves.org/

[2] Showing Up: The Power and potential of We, by Andrew Venezia in The Coming Waves: Evolution, Transformation, and Action in an Integral Way, (edited by Dustin DiPerna and H.B. Augustine) http://www.thecomingwaves.org/

Posted in Multi-community membership, We-Space | Tagged , , | 12 Comments

Heard in the Techno-progressive Pub…

Singularity UniversityThe other day, I went to a meeting of London Futurists with the title When linearity met exponential – a summer at Singularity University. As expected, the conversation  was focused on various technological aspects of our future.  Towards the end I raised my hand to introduce a different, techno-communitarian perspective. There were more people who expressed their resonance with my point of view than I thought there will be.

After the end of the formal meeting, we continued the conversation in a nearby pub, and decided to meet again online. Using the message board of the London Futurists’ Meet-up site, I opened the Techno-progressive Pub.

Somebody wrote there:

> I’ve also read a bit about Principia Cybernetica and the Global Brain Project

I replied:

It’s good to know. I presented a paper at the first Global Brain workshop in 2001 on Designing for the Emergence of a Global-scale Collective Intelligence: Invitation to a Research Collaboration.

As you will see, I’m a bit more concerned by liberating the Collective Intelligence (CI) of human communities and institutions than by AI alone or even Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) or friendly AI. That’s because I believe that some of the AI breakthroughs will be used for evil, oppressive purposes (in fact, they already are) and the best antidote or insurance policy is augmenting the CI of the ecosystem of social innovation initiatives.

> The cybernetic-techno-progressive-global-bra­­in antithesis seems to be that humanity and technology will naturally co-evolve or self-organise to ever greater integration and harmony, unless some negative force counteracts that. Can these two worldviews be combined into one synthesis?

I define CI as “the capacity of human communities to evolve towards higher order complexity and harmony, through such innovation mechanisms as variation-feedback-selection, differentiation-integration-transformati­on, and competition-cooperation-coopetition.”­ However, evolution is not linear; huge detours do happen and humankind can become an aborted experience if we don’t pay attention.

Whether singularity will be friendly or unfriendly is less of a question of clashing worldviews, but (differently educated) guessing. For me, the issue of worldviews come up around the choice about what we should invest the most attention/energy/resources. One is betting on AI and AGI, the other is on positively addressing the Einsteinian challenge: “No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.” Raising our CI, at every scale, is not the same as, but a critical condition for, augmenting our level of consciousness.

The two worldviews can be combined into one synthesis, but not by a cognitive mash-up, rather in a transcend-and-include way. A CI-focused path would both include AI and AGI, and transcend them, by putting them in service to the need of empowering human communities and institutions to make wiser decisions.

If Effective Altruism is prioritizing projects focused humanity’s long-term future, I’m wondering whether there is anybody in that movement, who would consider providing to support to augmenting humankind’s intelligence that Doug Engelbart so eloquently spoke of, 50 years ago?

Thank you for your reflections and question that triggered mine. Can this be the beginning of a small-scale experiment in our  collective intelligence? 🙂

Posted in Singularity, Technologies That Support CI | Leave a comment