Somewhere, on our way to humankind’s awakening to its collective wisdom, global heart, and sentience… self-organizing communities of co-creation and practice will master the combination of swarm intelligence ( see also starlings as teachers ) with wildfire learning (see chapter 7 in my Federated Framework for Self-evolving Educational Experience Design on Massive Scale).
Search
What is collective intelligence?
Collective intelligence is the capacity of human communities to evolve towards higher order complexity and harmony, through such innovation mechanisms as variation-feedback-selection, differentiation-integration-transformation, and competition-cooperation-coopetition-
Join 5,212 other subscribers
Categories
- 4-Fold Ecosystem
- Academic Research in CI
- AI
- and CI
- Autonomy
- Autonomy, Communion, and CI
- Blogging for Emergence
- C I & All Quadrants All Levels
- Chaordic Chat
- CI & Communities of Practice
- CI & Consciousness
- CI Basics
- CI of Open Source
- CI Principles
- CI Within
- Co-intelligent Economy
- Cognitive Relations
- Collaborative Sense-Making
- Collaborative Taxonomy
- Collective Intellect Augments Individual
- Collective Objectivity
- Collective Wisdom
- Communion
- Community of CI Practitioners
- Connecting Our Conversations
- Contemplative Practice
- Definitions
- Democracy and CI
- Earth Commons
- Events
- Evolutionary Movement
- Evolutionary Threshold
- From States to New Stage
- Global Brain
- Global Challenge
- Hypertinence
- Imaginal Cells
- Infinite Game
- Intelligence
- Intersubjectivity
- Knowledge Ecology
- Leaning into the Unknown
- Literature
- Local to Global to Local
- Mental Modeling
- Methodologies associated with CI
- Movement Cartography
- Movies and videos
- Multi-community membership
- Pattern Language
- Politics and CI
- Presencing
- Questions Worth Asking
- Reboot
- Shared Attention
- Shared Mindfulness
- Singularity
- Songs
- Spiral Dynamics & the Colors of CI
- Synchronicity and CI
- Technologies That Support CI
- Thomas Hübl
- Time, attention, bandwidth & CI
- Towards an attention economy of CI
- Truth of Impersonality
- Uncategorized
- Visualizing Our Ecosystem
- Ways of Tuning with Collective Consciousness
- We-Space
- 3D mindmapping
- amplifying complexity
- attenuating complexity
- augmented reality
- autonomous commons groups
- autonomy
- blogs wikis
- Chaordic Chat
- co-inspiration
- co-sensing
- co-tweeting
- collaborative sense-making
- collaborative video editing
- collaborative video making
- collective intelligence
- collective learner
- collective sensing organ
- collective sentience
- collective wisdom
- commend-and-control
- community
- compacting
- compassion
- complexity
- corporate refugees
- courage
- data
- democratizing complexity
- differentiation
- disruptive social practices
- distant proximities
- distributed cognition
- Drupal
- ego
- epistemic break
- evolution's trick
- Gaia management
- Google Wave
- harvesting
- hierarchy
- holopticism
- Indra's Net
- information
- junto
- luminous moment
- mapping the future
- media wall
- memetic flows
- metabeing
- methodology
- organizing work
- practice
- practice worth replicating
- presencing
- process
- prototyping
- relevant cognitive unit
- scaling up collective intelligence
- shared attention
- social body
- social media
- social media jedi
- social network
- Social Presencing Theater
- social tetrahedron
- Society 2.0
- talent retention
- taxonomy
- theater
- trustnet
- value memes
- virtual nation
- Web 2.0
-
Recent Activity
Archives
- October 2022
- July 2021
- June 2021
- April 2021
- June 2020
- September 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- September 2018
- August 2018
- January 2018
- October 2017
- September 2017
- January 2017
- September 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- January 2016
- October 2015
- September 2015
- June 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- April 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- May 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
Meta
-
Ce(tte) oeuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Paternité 2.0 Belgique.
George, just read your 2010 SEED-M paper. We need to resume dialog. Larry/nuet
nuet1370@gmail.com http://nuet.us/
LikeLike
Thanks Larry, I agree. The problem is that I’m fully booked till my presentation at the Integral Europe Conference. See: https://blogofcollectiveintelligence.com/2014/01/31/the-emergence-of-higher-we-spaces/
LikeLike
Conference looks quite interesting. And Budapest !! Email when you have time for dialog. Enjoy.
Larry
LikeLike
George,
There is a new book called “The Surprising Power of Liberating Structures” (Lipmanowicz and McCandless) that has a process in it called 1-2-3-4.
It points the way to more promising ways of decisively proving the that collective intelligence is usually smarter that individual intelligence in complex systems.
If you can take a look, please let me know what possibilities do you see in it.
Best,
Charlie Smith
LikeLike
I just need to clarify something. Instead talking of “humankind’s awakening to its collective wisdom, global heart, and sentience” it would be more appropriate to speak of “humankind’s awakening to the next level of its collective wisdom, global heart, and sentience.” The first phrase would allow a romantic interpretation of a future world, in which everybody will be awakened. The second is focusing “only” on what we need to do to support the evolutionary impulse in/as us to follow its course to the the next stage of the collective learning journey.
LikeLike
George, Your important distinction echos what has concerned me for decades. A viable future will involve human persons doing things. Imagined scenarios through end games appear impossible to imagine. Often visions of romantic awakening block further action.
Look up details on DENIAL: Self-Deception, False Beliefs, and the Origins of the Human Mind, by Ajit Varki & Danny Brower (a UofA research prof who died suddenly in 2007, leaving behind a revolutionary manuscript that led to this book). Just started reading. Following their lead I propose: instead of seeking what we must do to solve our great challenges, we must first discover those deep barriers that block (by emotionally denying the reality of our deep threats) our doing what we need to do. Then do what is needed to overcome those barriers. DENIAL OF REALITY, which the authors speculate/propose enabled first humans to accept a full Theory of Mind – and thus deny our mortality. Other intelligent species who start developing a Theory of Mind without the safety net of denial are blocked in their further advancement to a human style mind. Spin-off from this human survival trait is now blocking our advance and threatening our survival.
The recent suicide of Michael Ruppert highlights what we face if we accept REALITY without hope.
http://cherispeak.wordpress.com/2014/04/15/crossing-over-the-rubicon-r-i-p-michael-c-ruppert/
http://prn.fm/lifeboat-hour-carolyn-bakerfor-mimi-german-041314/
Listen to The Lifeboat Hour he recorded with Carolyn Baker before he ended the pain. Carolyn, Michael and others have accepted an Earth Hospice model. For me, UPLIFT and Societal Metamorphosis is a viable alternative to extinction. I need these visions to keep my own sanity as I continue encountering THE NEWS:
http://nuet.us/2014/04/20/exploring-the-newsstory-of-reality/
What I can’t seem to communicate is that the effort needed now is beyond scope and magnitude of any past human efforts. Humankind can do it, but they need to accept that all of what we are now doing is grossly insufficient to our need. Much of what we are doing is necessary, but far from sufficient. There are doings that are not being considered, but also necessary. Then we can marshal the effort to do all that is needed. This we universally deny, myself included at a deep, emotional level. The effort must involve design/implementation for all SSS (Seeds, Soils, Scaffolding). Soils and Scaffolding will not automatically emerge from Seeds – a fact we refuse to accept. Our paradox is that we are obsessed with creating seeds (actions that bolster our denial) and hoping for soils and scaffolding. Today, all effort re soils and scaffolding primarily involves creating seeds about them. Something more is needed beyond the production and distribution of sem networks. To organically design/implement pilot soils and scaffolding – involving the collective creation of seed systems that are instructional/motivational for the actual construction of soils and scaffolding. I had proposed Scripting/Performing cycles for this. O4L&L4O (Organizing for Learning & Learning for Organizing) is a label for a framework to do this. But, our problem currently blocks attention to solutions.
THE REALITY WE DENY IS NOT BE THE REALITY THAT IS OUR OPTION TO CREATE !!!!!
The scary, negative reality we deny, to keep our sanity, is blocking access to a positive reality fully within our reach.
Our time to act may be much shorter than we imagine. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article38208.htm
LikeLike
I think none of our cognitive, techno-scientific smarts will do much good, unless we find ways to raise our consciousness, individual and collective, above the level, at which we generated our intertwining challenges, to paraphrase Einstein.
LikeLike
George, I will postpone dialog on issues you raise until after your conference.
1) What types of awakenings are we aware of, what “techno-scientific” practices can induce or enhance awakenings, and what future awakenings might there be not yet experienced by any humans?
2) Is there a preferred order of doing and how do we know, or might we consider a co-doing at many concurrent levels?
3) I might use Einstein to propose that no human has yet been awakened sufficiently to adequately “comprehend”/”intuit” the magnitude/scope/complexity of our current Crisis-of-Crises and the emergent field of viable opportunities.
4) Might intentionally developed human collectives (cybercrews) be needed to adequately navigate/manage some aspects of emergent reality?
HOLD ON THESE UNTIL LATER.
Larry/nuet
LikeLike