The social tetrahedron: a step towards prototyping Indra’s Net

Tetrahedron“The user profile can also show people and initiatives that one values as part of an ‘extended’, empathic self. This can be done by dragging and dropping other profiles into one’s tetrahedron, much as Twitter allows one to follow admired people. To add a person or cause to one’s empathic self, the profile creator could rotate the tetrahedron to populate a personal frame of reference (filling it with family and friends), a civic frame of reference (e.g. with admired individuals and organizations working for the commons), and a professional or business frame (with valued coworkers). Individuals and initiatives included in one’s “extended self” also could be made visible to others, when access rights are set, by double-clicking on a given face of one’s user profile.” Mark Frazier, @openworld

Mark, the most beautiful thing about your wise model is that it’s doable!

In your tetrahedron, I see a seed crystal for growing disruptive social practices. For example, practices for large-scale, bottom up self-organization of a new social body, may it be a personal learning network, a trustnet-based virtual nation or a federation of co-creative initiatives.

When a social body is grown on networks of desire, networks of what the extended, empathic self of everyone values, then, then the harmony in the system will let it absorb much higher doses of complexity.

Mark, in your tetrahedron, I also see Indra’s net materializing, taking the shape of millions of tetrahedrons interacting, free from the gravity of legacy institutions! It’s like a massively co-written, continually unfolding science fiction that we shape just by playing with our co-intelligence and co-creativity toys.

Heartfelt thank you Mark for the huge contribution you’ve already made by developing and sharing your thoughts on the tetrahedron. I am eager to discover more of the world, from which it came.

p.s. I re-posted this note from a junto talk because in version 0.5, it cannot yet be tagged, categorized and have a URL.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Methodologies associated with CI, Technologies That Support CI, Visualizing Our Ecosystem | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

from CI to collective wisdom in Silicon valley

Just picked up on Twitter this link to a 6-min vid on YouTube about:

Wisdom 2.0 in the Valley.jpg
Then I found the conference’s website and, thanks to Albert Klamt, its Facebook page.

I feel meme deserve our support to move beyond Silicon Valley; let’s help it find new places and connections in Europe and elsewhere…

Posted in Collective Wisdom | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

What can dynamic views (in mapping emergent systems) enable?

In a comment to A tool for mapping the future as it’s emerging, Glisten wrote:

> The visual mapping of an evolving system is not a trivial affair. If
we create a map of our “current state” we only provide a snapshot view
of what is more closely aligned analogously with a continual stream of
images such as video…

Yet, for humankind’s emergent metabeing to become fully conscious of itself (as whole and parts), it must grow simultaneous capacity and tools for the awareness of both the structural and dynamic aspects of its life.

Why not prototype that feature into the élan mapping tool? I have some ideas of how we and the groups we want to support could greatly enhance our sensing of, and making meaning from, the next level of emergence (at any scale that our imagination can hold). However, what is more important than my ideas is our co-sensing what is really needed with members of those groups.

Before inviting them to this blog exchange, let’s imagine what a globally linked creative community could do with new tools and ways to sense breakthrough practices in any domain, as son as they appear in our global nervous system: in our connected conversations.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Continue reading

Posted in Collaborative Sense-Making, Connecting Our Conversations, Evolutionary Movement, Local to Global to Local, Movies and videos, Shared Attention, Visualizing Our Ecosystem | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

In defense of complexity

Somebody wrote in a group on “Transforming Capitalism” in the Presencing community  :

> all complex civilisations have collapsed at one point or another. Only ‘simple’ societies have managed to survive.

Cellular Complexity by David Sweatt.gifIn the spirit of helping each other unearthing our assumptions, let me point out that the feudal society that invented the first forms of science was more complex than the slave-based mode of production that, in turn, was more complex than the hunter-gatherer mode of production. The same is true for capitalism that is more complex than the feudal society, and emerging, post-capitalist reality that is moving towards global-scale self-organization and collective intelligence, which will be more (not less) complex than the capitalist world. More complex means capable to differentiate, absorb and integrate more variety.

Just think of nature. Hasn’t life been moving towards increasing complexity from the single-cellular to the multi-cellular organism, from worms to mammalians and humans? (To let that really sink in, use the Cellular Complexity painting above, by  David Sweatt, as a meditation object.Click on the image to enlarge.) You can find another example of increasing complexity in your own life. Isn’t it a story of increasing the variety of phenomena that you were capable to differentiate, absorb and integrate, from kindergarten, to school and adulthood?

The move towards more complexity doesn’t stop in adulthood. The development of such subsequent value systems depicted by Spiral Dynamics as TruthForce, StriveDrive, HumanBond, FlexFlow, GlobalView, is also an evolution towards more complexity. (I wrote more about it in Communitas Sapiens that you can find in the files of the London Integral Circle, and in my paper on Collective Intelligence, Collective Leadership .) In fact, 2nd tier stages of development, starting with FlexFlow and GlobalView are the first ones that cease to think of complexity as an enemy to defeat and start appreciating it.

Facing the overwhelming complexity of today’s world, the “natural” response is to look back and long for a lost “natural rhythm and pace.” That’s the best that our individual ego can find when one’s world is growing more complex than one can fully comprehend. It is the best that it can do, simply, because it cannot see what is above its head: the next level, at which the assumption that I, me, mine, is the most important in the world is recognized as an increasingly useless assumption.

What if
what we sense as overwhelming complexity was only evolution’s trick to seduce us  into the collective identities and shared minds needed to make sense and higher meaning out of our world? What if someday we woke up realizing that we left the fixation with the narrower perspectives behind just as we did with toys that we’ve outgrown in the kindergarten? What if that day was today?

I know, it’s easier said than done. Spreading good practices worth replicating does help. Here is a beautiful example. The good news is there’s a growing number of us who recognize that awakening communities are not the death of our individuality, only the death of our ego. In fact, autonomy gains never before experienced depth and richness in the unfolding dynamics and interplay between autonomy and communion. So, what are we waiting for? 🙂

Posted in Autonomy, Communion, and CI, Collaborative Sense-Making, Spiral Dynamics & the Colors of CI | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Message to Venessa Miemis about her “Pay It Forward Business Model”

Venessa Miemis.jpgVenessa wrote a fascinating blog entry  on

A Pay It Forward Business Model [in transition to a new global society].”

It prompted the following open message to her.

Dear Venessa,

Your “pay it forward” model is hugely inspiring in all of the various scope of its meaning! 

I start responding from the one that is the juiciest for me, the scope of our Emerging Planetary Reality.  We’re in the midst of a world transition that still has to generate highly-scalable practices of value creation and exchange beyond the logic of the incumbent mode of production. I see your quest in the context of that larger one.

As Scott Lewis  wrote: “In regards to the gift economy, I don’t think we’ve ever been without it.” True, it persisted throughout human history but largely as an under current of economic activity. Now it is stepping into history’s limelight a second time.

This time, it comes with a mission: to help freeing the energies of our individual and social creativity, intuition, caring, and imagination, trapped in work systems that don’t honor our highest aspirations. Only liberating those energies, will Emergence gain enough momentum to lift us into the next civilization.  (Here, “next” means: capable to operate at a higher level of complexity and harmony.) The value of your offer to the world, at that level, is in its contribution to that liberation. It’s like “a small step for Venessa, one giant leap for mankind.” 🙂

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Continue reading

Posted in Co-intelligent Economy, Collaborative Sense-Making, Connecting Our Conversations, Methodologies associated with CI, Technologies That Support CI | 2 Comments

A tool for mapping the future as it’s emerging in the present

This blogpost is the first public news of a project that I am working on with a small team of friends; it is focused on creating a tool for the interactive, 3-d mapping of the ecosystem of evolutionary initiatives on the edge. We call it the élan map. élan also stands for the yet-to-born Evolutionary Learning & Action Network.

“The larger social structures are proving to be inadequate to solve
the problems they’re creating. New social innovations are emerging
everywhere, but they are not sufficiently connected or empowered. So
right now, any effort that we can make to connect and create greater
synergy and participation in this awakening process is probably the most
important thing we can do
“. (Barbara Marx Hubbard, 2003)

élan proposes providing a technical and social
platform for collaborative sensing and meaning-making to augment the
collective intelligence, wisdom, and capabilities of groups and
movements on the leading edge of social evolution. It is to the
evolutionary impulse in them and us that we dedicate our work.

The concept of élan,
when fully embodied, will be an activity ecosystem that includes an
interactive map for navigating Emergence (the concept of which is introduced here), an online
magazine, a bio-mimicry inspired, community knowledge garden, and a
network of self-organizing communities of users/contributors. The latter
will also include a research think-net that will scan the landscape of
our Emerging Planetary Reality to identify early signs of strategic
challenges and opportunities for the movement.

Neuronfire.gifThere are two lenses through which you can look at this project.

1. Seen through the lens of “global brain,” it’s about creating a visual tool to help organizations/groups on the edge:

• Experiencing themselves as neurons in the nervous system of the passage to a new civilization

• Discovering how they can interact with other neurons for rapid and effective transmissions

2. Seen through the lens of complex system of initiatives that are harbingers of the future in the present, it’s about making it easier for:

• Individuals to decide which are the initiatives with which they resonate the most and to which they want to give more attention and energy

• Groups to assess their functional alignment with each other in the neighboring niches of the fast-changing ecosystem of evolutionary initiatives, thus multiply everyone’s transformative impact

• A kernel of knowledge about the field of social transformation, to become a booster of the field’s self-knowledge and collective intelligence

The last point also implies that “if we increase our ability to perceive (visualize, understand) problems or opportunities or activities, it will leverage our efforts greatly… If we really could perceive and make sense of much larger chunks at the same time, a lot of stuff would sort itself out quite easily.” — Flemming Funch

What we also hope is that such a mapping tool will let its individual and collective users:

• Discover common patterns of concerns, projects, and practices
worth replicating across a vast range of initiatives, whilst remaining
sensitive to the uniqueness of each individual context.
• Discover and tell the story of emergence into a wiser culture, as
it unfolds. “Wiser” as in: capable of embracing broader and higher
perspectives.
• Increase connectivity so there are more resources available  to
the ecosystem as a whole and its parts.
• Increase coherent communication between initiatives, to
facilitate the process of transformation.

• Make it easy for people to find the best match between their
desire to serve the whole, and the most suitable contexts for that
service.

These are the descriptors that we currently plan to use for characterizing them: Philosophy (including Mission Values, Principles), Structure, Founder(s), Leadership patterns, Projects, Organizational affinities, News, Events, and Social media presence. That list will probably change as we play with a modified version of Narrative Fractals and other approaches.

Our current focus is on developing the content structure of the map, then go into an alpha proof-of-concept, and beta prototype. Once the beta is made public, we will explore what’s next. Next moth, we also plan to open a public site for our collaborators.

Meanwhile, we started building two advisory groups. Terry Patten, author and integral thought leader accepted our invitation to serve on the project’s Wisdom Council and Scott Nelson, an information technology steward, who will work with us to build out a Drupal platform for the community of élan collaborators and serve on our Technical Advisory Group.

We’re curious of what you think of the features and capabilities that could make the map and the mapping tool really useful to you as individual, and to your group or organization if it lives on the edge of social, knowledge, technology or business innovation.

Your input could directly influence the design of the mapping tool. Please comment.

P.S. on June 30:
Good tools always have unintended uses discovered by its individual and collective users, and hopefully, that will be the case of élan map, too. Once we released the alpha version, a direction worth looking in to find new uses is this: there will be some hypertrails connecting the vistas that may emerge fro our very walking those trails. That’s the subject of another blog entry.

Posted in Collaborative Sense-Making, Evolutionary Movement, Technologies That Support CI, Visualizing Our Ecosystem | 13 Comments

Chaordic Chat Practice / social media jedis / ContemplaTweet

yoda.jpgChaordic Chat is a practice for social media jedis, I don’t use the “jedi” metaphor lightly but in its original meaning: jedis are bound to a code of morality and justice and are trained in the use of the light side of the Force.

That morality today, implies using the power of social media for supporting the unfolding of the Great Story, of the world transition to our Emerging Planetary Reality. It is a transition driven by the same evolutionary impulse that pulls you into learning and growing new, more complex capabilities.

Continue reading

Posted in CI Within, Methodologies associated with CI, Technologies That Support CI | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

volcanic ash / distant proximities / Earth Commons rising / singularity / Teilhard de Chardin / Dilbert

In a conversation at CONTACT _Con-4191AF2D476 World-Citizen Panels about the irruption of the Icelandic volcano, Rolf Carriere wrote, “a beautiful example of distant proximities in our glocal world.”

Distant Proximities cover.jpgI googled “distant proximities” which led me to discover the book
Distant Proximities: Dynamics beyond Globalization
by James Rosenau. You can download its first chapter here.

I can hardly wait to read the book because it seems to be very
relevant to our deeper understanding of the phenomena of “Earth Commons rising
.

The Foreign Affairs journal’s reviewer wrote about the book:”In this sweeping study of global change, Rosenau argues that the world is undergoing an epochal transformation driven by relentless scientific and technological advances that collapse time and distance and alter the dimensions of political space. . . . Rosenau convincingly illustrates the increasing complexity of global relationships.”

The destination of that growing collapse of time and

distance is also known as “technological singularity.”

Don’t even think about whom to blame for that collapse. Why
not, you ask?

Continue reading

Posted in Blogging for Emergence, Earth Commons, Local to Global to Local, Singularity | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Collecive intelligence tools for supporting global cooperative work

The stellar line up of workshops at the upcoming ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work reflects the edge of CSCW research, with profound implications for the global-scale cooperative work needed to mach global challenges.

Technically, it has become possible to connect constellations of CI pools of any size. That possibility, when coupled with the passion of social innovators and the wizards of social process technologies, is a key enabler of the current and much needed shift in the evolution of how we organize ourselves as societies and as the crew of Spaceship Earth…

Back to the ACM Conference on CSCW, I’ve just learned that there will be a workshop on software tools to support Collective Intelligence in organizations. I’m wondering whether the designers/organizers of the conference envisioned to wrap it into a blanket of advanced CI tools and methods, as to augment the CI of the field of CI tool makers, itself?

The program doesn’t say anything about it, probably because the focus is CI in organizations, as it should be, not what it can do for solving world problems. Nevertheless, I believe that there will be a good number of people among the delegates, speakers, panelists, and interactive poster presenters, who feel inspired to address the broader implications of frontier research in CSCW for the world.

What could crystallize that interest so that during the conference a “Big Picture” caucus can form (under any other name) and explore research questions of common or adjacent interest? This blog entry is a message in a bottle, thrown into the digital ocean for someone interested in that question…

 

message in a bottle.jpg

Posted in Academic Research in CI, Collaborative Sense-Making, Community of CI Practitioners, Questions Worth Asking, Technologies That Support CI | 2 Comments

Collective intelligence needs guidance from collective wisdom

Both CI and CW have many definitions, depending on the lens of the discipline (or our developmental stage on theSpiral), through which we look at them. My current articulation of what is CI is this:

Collective intelligence is the capacity of human communities to evolve towards higher order complexity and harmony. Both of them are a long-term trend and general direction of evolution.

Social entities evolve by using such innovation mechanisms as variation-feedback-selection, differentiation-integration-transformation, and competition-cooperation-coopetition, successfully tested by life for billions years.

Besides CI seen through the “evolutionary lens” introduced above, there are also other ways to look at it, for example:

Through the “cognitive lens”
http://www.community-intelligence.com/blogs/public/archives/cat_def…

Four types of CI
http://www.twine.com/item/12j7q8lj8-t4/types-of-collective-intellig…

In order to evolve, social groups need not only collective intelligence but also collective wisdom, the human faculty to sense, think, feel, and act from an ever broader, deeper, more encompassing perspective.

Collective intelligence and collective wisdom are an a priori, inherent potential of all human groups. If and when they manifest that potential, they do it in different, culturally defined ways that can enhance each other. Hence the interest of diversity-in-unity when it comes to augment our CI<-CW.

The notation CI<-CW refers to the need that for CI to be applied successfully in times of massive transitions into the unknown, it has to be guided by collective wisdom. Without the latter, the gap between our technological and consciousness development risks increasing and bringing rather unpleasant consequences to human society.

Selected resources on collective intelligence:
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_Intelligence
Blog of CI
http://www.community-intelligence.com/blogs/public/
A source document of CI
http://www.community-intelligence.com/blogs/public/2007/01/a_source…
Co-Intelligence Institute
http://www.co-intelligence.org/
MIT Center for CI
http://cci.mit.edu/
from the Transitioner
http://wiki.thetransitioner.org/English/Collective_Intelligence

Selected resources on collective wisdom:
Collective Wisdom Initiative
http://www.collectivewisdominitiative.org/
Centered On the Edge: Mapping a Field of Collective Intelligence & Spiritual Wisdom
http://www.collectivewisdominitiative.org/CenteredOnTheEdge//theboo…
The Power of Collective Wisdom
http://www.collectivewisdominitiative.org/papers/CWI_book/about_the…

Posted in Collective Wisdom | Leave a comment