What Is My Collective IQ? – Boosting CI from Within

In the last couple of months I’ve been swamped by work aimed at raising the collective intelligence of three global professional networks. It kept me busy and away from blog-writing but it also provided snippets of new experience that will certainly flow into the blog. I’m not yet emerging from that work but have just come across, in the CI folder of my hard disk, the “What Is My Collective IQ? CI Starts Within!” paper that I presented first at International Colloquium at the University of Ottawa, June 24, 2003. Whilst you’re waiting for some fresh materials, I thought that some of my newer thoughts triggered by that paper could lead to an interesting, collaborative inquiry. Let me know whether you agree.


What if we coupled the “CI-as-out-there” perspective of investigation with the “CI-as-in-here” perspective? How would it be if we took not an external/objective but an internal/subjective look at CI? To what new approaches could these questions open access? Is participatory observation in oneself as a “collective intelligence” unit possible? Let’s give it a try and we’ll see.
We can start with observing the mutually embedded relationship of two holons:
A. The collective intelligence of the Whole is in each of us, is part of us. This is a minor holon compared with B.
B. Our individual intelligences escape into the higher-order complexity of collective intelligence, through a meta-system transition, and get continually transcended and included.
With the advent of the Web, we as individuals started experiencing the many intellectual and practical advantages of using the global brain as an extension of our own — accessing knowledge anywhere in the world, which is as close as files on our own hard disk. This is an expression of holon A.
CI is embedded in us, in two ways:
1. We are products of the co-evolving intelligence of Life itself. Not to mention our ancestors in the mineral, plant, and animal kingdoms, we are products of many millennia of social evolution. We couldn’t have language, tools, not even our most intimate thoughts and feelings, without the long journey of CI marking stages in humankind’s history.
2. We are connected through our various networks, the nerve endings of which are inside our own existence. The nervous system of a group, enterprise, or other social holon, is the network of conversations that constitutes it. Participating in meaningful conversations, we may pursue our various individual agenda, and as by-product, we help imaginal cells of our CI connect into larger patterns of meaning.
When we become conscious of the impersonal, beyond-our-small-self nature of the experience of having the larger CI as close as our keyboard, mobile phones, or transpersonal contemplations, then something surprising and truly charming happens:
Realizing that we are made of CI and it is made of us, we start feeling hungry for the connections with others, from which this mutual embeddedness is continually co-arising. As if grateful children wanted to give back something to their parents.
What does it mean to be collective intelligence, both as holon A. and B? That question translates into:
1. How does CI manifest in myself? What is my C-IQ and what will it take to boost it?
2. How does CI manifest in my community or organization ? What is our Collective IQ and what will it take to boost it?
Both questions call for a model of CI, capable to help us discerning, assessing, and enhancing the factors that together generate it, and the interaction of those factors. The best model of CI that I found so far is the one developed by Professor Pierre Lévy, Canada Research Chair of Collective Intelligence at the University of Ottawa.
<CI%206-pole1%2C%20small.jpg>
The bi-directional arrows represent two-way value flows across the following 6 poles, the interaction of which is necessary to the emergence of CI: Reflection, Intention, Competence, Recorded memory, Trusted relationships, and Enabling technologies.
Note on the next slide the labels that are different from the ones above, which contribute additional meaning to the model. For example, look at the loop around each of the 6 poles:
CI%206-pole2%2C%20small.jpg
Knowing that the intelligence potential of biological species is increasing with the increase of connections among the cells in their nervous system, we can extrapolate that increasing value-creating connections among the poles of a social organism (both holon A and B type), will boost its Collective IQ.
If CI starts within, then my next questions are:
• How to increase connectivity within each of my 6 CI poles?
• How to increase connectivity across those poles?
Examples of increasing connectivity within each of the 6 factors:
If my intentions are a rowdy bunch of competing desires and ambitions, then my C-IQ, the intelligence of the Whole in me, will be most likely lower than if those intentions are aligned and connected with something larger than me. My C-IQ would get the biggest boost from my intentions if I could align them with direction of Evolution in me towards increasing consciousness, compassion, and capacity to absorb more complexity. I know that it is easier said then done, but what else is interesting than committing to practices aiming at such alignment?
Our mind is frequently jumping from one thought to the next, creating disjoint series of only loosely connected reflections. Sometimes it feels as if the mind was using us, not we using our mind. We can increase the connectivity of our reflections by contemplation, meditation, focused creativity and other practices. Each of them will contribute to boost our C-IQ.
Humans may not swim as swiftly as dolphins or run as fast as gazelles but have a repertory of competences far richer than other species. A better understanding of the interrelatedness of our intellectual faculties, such as memory, sensing, discerning, intuiting, etc. will let one invest in those area of his/her capabilities which have stronger pulling-up effect on the other areas.
The recorded memory of my mental models allows for their critical examination and the improvement of their clarity and coherence, which in turn is a booster of my C-IQ.
The wider and more diverse is my network of trusted relationships, the more connected I am with a larger variety of life experiences and perspectives on reality. That is, clearly, a significant booster of the CI within.
Finally, enabling technologies, such as massive and miniaturized memory storage, high-speed connection to the global brain, more processing power available to individuals than ever before, can be connected in configurations optimized for augmenting CI that operates inside us.
Now, let’s step up the level of examining the possibility of boosting the C-IQ of a person, and move from increasing the connection within the 6 poles to increasing it across them. For example, what if we could liberate the full potential of value flowing from our reflections to our enabling technologies and vice versa? What if the circular flow of information between our intentions, recorded memories, and trusted relationships could be accelerated so that we would be able to mobilize more individual representations of the collective mind faster for meeting the needs of a project at hand?
With the help of smart visualization tools and practice, we can become ever more skillful in mapping the components of our C-IQ and taking snapshots whenever we want to assess our progress in boosting it.
The stream of ideas presented here has been focused on the first of these two questions.
1. How does CI manifest in myself? What is my C-IQ and what will it take to boost it?
2. How does CI manifest in my community or organization ? What is our Collective IQ and what will it take to boost it?
The second question is a real concern of managers of People Development or Organization Design or any facilitator of transformation in communities and organizations, which require and expansion of their CI. That will be the focus of an executive seminar that I’m working on next.
If you are one of those interested in the second question, maybe these hints will help:
• Start with optimizing the working conditions in your organization for boosting CI-within, using the 6-pole model as a framework. There are many methods and tools to do so. Some of them are blogged about here, others are still in my mind, unwritten.
• Develop and facilitate a collaborative action research or “learning expedition”
for assessing the C-IQ of your team or organization, using the 6-pole model.
• Form a learning team with your colleagues interested to pioneer the boosting of collective intelligence within and without. Only then you will have a chance a chance to keep up with the growing number of books, articles, websites, through which our WE-intelligence is groping towards becoming conscious of itself.

This entry was posted in CI Within. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to What Is My Collective IQ? – Boosting CI from Within

  1. This is a super posting. I have been pointing at this blog every since Tom Atlee introduced me to it, and today the collective intelligence portal page on my web site is one of the top five and for this time period, one of the top three.
    I have spent time in both government bureaucracies and corporate bureaucracies, and what really strikes me as the most pathological aspect of both, a common strait, is what is known in some circles as “lines in the road.” This is where little fiefdoms are allowed to flourish, and they avoid conflict by fragmenting their collective intelligence instead of working creatively together–one unit handles one region, and refuses to work with another unit that has countries sending terrorists into the first region. In business one unit focuses on making sales to one client segment, and refuses to share either the collected information, or the developed software, or the corporate lessons learned, with any other unit.
    What you have posted here is really great. I will point others to it.

    Like

  2. mark ranford says:

    I fully agree with Roberts comments.
    I find tremendous value in this post by George. Somehow I feel that its relevance is not going to be recognised as widely as it deserves (I maybe wrong).
    But what I feel is that the language and the terminolgy is too far ahead of the thinking of many practising managers. Dont think that is meant as a criticism, its not. I understand that these are complex issues and that complex and new language is sometimes required to get across meaning, especially when much of our traditional language usage is burdened by past mechanistic and reductionistic views of the world. I am a “wholist” and I really love what George is leading us towards. I just wish that the gap to bridge this thinking with the majority of practicing managers was easier to bridge.
    I certainly think that using our internal CI as an example to help us think about CI out there, is a good help to communicate the thinking. But George do you think that there are ways to make these complex concepts more immediate and understandable? Are there ways to bring their own direct experiences to bear when internalizing these points. Would “Storytelling” ala Steve Demmings, be useful tools.

    Like

  3. Mark says and then asks, “I certainly think that using our internal CI as an example to help us think about CI out there, is a good help to communicate the thinking. But George do you think that there are ways to make these complex concepts more immediate and understandable? Are there ways to bring their own direct experiences to bear when internalizing these points. Would “Storytelling” ala Steve Demmings, be useful tools.” Mark, George and many 😉 others, i would suggest any creative activity, i mean authentic creativity that utilises the unconscious or pre-conscious aspects of human learning, knowing and intellegences (esp. embodied and enactive disciplines) as well as those high in Emotional Intelligences. Senge said somewhere that the unconscious was the way to handle complexity in this ‘realm’. I think he was right. A man called At de Lange has some interesting ideas about this kind of creativity, he calls them the Five Sustainers of Human Creativity…Problem Solving, Dialogue, Game Playing, Exemplar Study and Art Expressing…a google search on At de Lange and the five sustainers whould turn up some information.
    Hope this helps keep the thread going;-)
    atb,
    Andrew

    Like

  4. Stories of CI within

    My last entry on “What Is My Collective IQ? – Boosting CI from Within” received some juicy comments. This one is my reply.

    Like

  5. pad says:

    Hi George>
    Like your work …
    it fits neatly with stuff many of are doing …
    if you want a simple one page version of how CI works in and out of space … just email me on pad@familus.com and I’ll reply with a copy of a story which is doing the rounds and makes it as simple as a welcome mat and an open window.
    Put Welcome Mate and your first name in the title window so I know it is a legit request.
    Do also checkout emrgnc as William is doing fine work in a similar field.
    Regards PAD

    Like

  6. People networks = collective intelligence

    George Por – who led a London collaboration cafe earlier in the year – has posted an item on his blog about how we can raise the collective intelligence of a group or network, and also the ability of the

    Like

  7. People networks = collective intelligence?

    George Por – who led a London collaboration cafe earlier in the year – has posted an item on his blog about how we can raise the collective intelligence of a group or network, and also the ability of the

    Like

  8. sim winter says:

    I liked the visualisation of Pierre Lévy
    I think it´s another good way to reduce complexity by means of visualisation
    You can better see or realize the connections and transitions then.
    Another thing: Have you heard about the “creative commons licence”?
    seems to be a collective iq raiser as well.
    🙂

    Like

  9. talk@ says:

    Collective Inelligence: boosting from within

    Blog of Collective Intelligence: What Is My Collective IQ? – Boosting CI from Within A tiny bit brainy but clever and well-formulated analysis of way to self-improve and boost connectivity within a collective mind Got me thinking…

    Like

  10. Headshift says:

    Blogs are not the only fruit

    Blogs may have been a word of the year for 2004, but a wider variety of social software tools and group structures will start to gain widespread adoption in 2005, which will present both challenges and opportunities for those of us who are implemen…

    Like

  11. “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler.” – A. Einstein.

    Thanks – I enjoyed dealing with this, perhaps because it was quite a stretch for me to “get it”.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s