The only way to cultivate focus is to have an alignment of what does and doesn’t deserve attention. Shared attention is both the cause and result of a cohesive community—and the reason why it’s true that “culture eats strategy for lunch.”
Search
What is collective intelligence?
Collective intelligence is the capacity of human communities to evolve towards higher order complexity and harmony, through such innovation mechanisms as variation-feedback-selection, differentiation-integration-transformation, and competition-cooperation-coopetition-
Join 5,212 other subscribers
Categories
- 4-Fold Ecosystem
- Academic Research in CI
- AI
- and CI
- Autonomy
- Autonomy, Communion, and CI
- Blogging for Emergence
- C I & All Quadrants All Levels
- Chaordic Chat
- CI & Communities of Practice
- CI & Consciousness
- CI Basics
- CI of Open Source
- CI Principles
- CI Within
- Co-intelligent Economy
- Cognitive Relations
- Collaborative Sense-Making
- Collaborative Taxonomy
- Collective Intellect Augments Individual
- Collective Objectivity
- Collective Wisdom
- Communion
- Community of CI Practitioners
- Connecting Our Conversations
- Contemplative Practice
- Definitions
- Democracy and CI
- Earth Commons
- Events
- Evolutionary Movement
- Evolutionary Threshold
- From States to New Stage
- Global Brain
- Global Challenge
- Hypertinence
- Imaginal Cells
- Infinite Game
- Intelligence
- Intersubjectivity
- Knowledge Ecology
- Leaning into the Unknown
- Literature
- Local to Global to Local
- Mental Modeling
- Methodologies associated with CI
- Movement Cartography
- Movies and videos
- Multi-community membership
- Pattern Language
- Politics and CI
- Presencing
- Questions Worth Asking
- Reboot
- Shared Attention
- Shared Mindfulness
- Singularity
- Songs
- Spiral Dynamics & the Colors of CI
- Synchronicity and CI
- Technologies That Support CI
- Thomas Hübl
- Time, attention, bandwidth & CI
- Towards an attention economy of CI
- Truth of Impersonality
- Uncategorized
- Visualizing Our Ecosystem
- Ways of Tuning with Collective Consciousness
- We-Space
- 3D mindmapping
- amplifying complexity
- attenuating complexity
- augmented reality
- autonomous commons groups
- autonomy
- blogs wikis
- Chaordic Chat
- co-inspiration
- co-sensing
- co-tweeting
- collaborative sense-making
- collaborative video editing
- collaborative video making
- collective intelligence
- collective learner
- collective sensing organ
- collective sentience
- collective wisdom
- commend-and-control
- community
- compacting
- compassion
- complexity
- corporate refugees
- courage
- data
- democratizing complexity
- differentiation
- disruptive social practices
- distant proximities
- distributed cognition
- Drupal
- ego
- epistemic break
- evolution's trick
- Gaia management
- Google Wave
- harvesting
- hierarchy
- holopticism
- Indra's Net
- information
- junto
- luminous moment
- mapping the future
- media wall
- memetic flows
- metabeing
- methodology
- organizing work
- practice
- practice worth replicating
- presencing
- process
- prototyping
- relevant cognitive unit
- scaling up collective intelligence
- shared attention
- social body
- social media
- social media jedi
- social network
- Social Presencing Theater
- social tetrahedron
- Society 2.0
- talent retention
- taxonomy
- theater
- trustnet
- value memes
- virtual nation
- Web 2.0
-
Recent Activity
Archives
- October 2022
- July 2021
- June 2021
- April 2021
- June 2020
- September 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- September 2018
- August 2018
- January 2018
- October 2017
- September 2017
- January 2017
- September 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- January 2016
- October 2015
- September 2015
- June 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- April 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- May 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
Meta
-
Ce(tte) oeuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Paternité 2.0 Belgique.
Hi George,
That paragraph you quote taken alone is open to being interpreted as exactly the opposite of what the larger article seems to be espousing.
The paragraph immediately following the one you quote above goes on to say:
“If a company truly wants to disrupt and adapt, it will create space for more perspectives. That will eventually create conflict—not regarding what the company must achieve, but only on the method to achieve it.”
So it is important that any collective contain many perspectives, and many attentions looking in many different directions for the threats (and opportunities) that may emerge from those directions.
If the group is aligned on their objectives, then the methods can adapt as new contexts emerge, new threats require mitigation strategies be implemented.
That is part of any system working in a complex environment – there must be an iterative aspect to working with complexity that is constantly looking for how the system responds to our probes and adjusts our actions accordingly (as we amplify or dampen emergent responses of the system as appropriate).
Thus we may agree on core values, like individual life and individual liberty, and the necessity of those values requiring responsible choices by all individuals as liberty must be constrained to actions within the class of the survivable, and the class that generally tends to expand the class of options available (the phenotypic expression of liberty). And in truly complex systems, that will always be complex and constantly evolving sets of constraints, as new forms emerge, and all forms by definition require boundaries and constraints to maintain existence.
So it is a constantly evolving journey (as the number of dimensions present constantly grows), rather than any sort of reachable destination.
LikeLike